Recovering from War - Gaps in early action

Author(s)
Chandran, R., Jones, B. and Smith, N.
Publication language
English
Pages
53pp
Date published
01 Jul 2008
Type
Research, reports and studies
Keywords
Accountability and Participation, Conflict, violence & peace, Post-conflict, Organisational

Our analysis identified three primary weaknesses in international performance in early recovery:
• A strategic gap – there was no evidence of strategy that encompassed political, security, development and humanitarian tools across bilateral and multi-lateral actors; and no framework for prioritization.
• A financing gap – instruments are neither flexible nor dynamic enough. Specifically:
- there is a gap in funding for standing capacity for strategic planning at country level

– there is a gap in funding for political implementation

– there is a gap in funding that is realistic, flexible, and responsive

– there is a gap in the ability to spend development money early.
• A series of capacity gaps – in leadership capacity; in implementation capacity; in sheer availability of civilian resources, and in a lack of training for purpose. To date, there has been no joint assessment of need, and bilateral efforts to are poorly coordinated.