Evaluation rubrics: how to ensure transparent and clear assessment that respects diverse lines of evidence

Author(s)
Oakden, J.
Publication language
English
Pages
20pp
Date published
01 Mar 2013
Type
Research, reports and studies
Keywords
Research methodology
Countries
New Zealand
Organisations
Better Evaluation

Independent external evaluators generally have to
work within a range of constraints. Often there is less
than ideal availability of time, money, or data. This
article presents an example of how a team of external
evaluators worked around these constraints on an
evaluation in the education sector.
The evaluation process incorporated the use of a logic
model to identify boundaries. It also featured the use of
rubrics, to make evaluative judgements – their use
supported robust data collection and framed analysis and
reporting. The evaluation used a mixed-methods
approach, which included qualitative and quantitative
survey data as well as existing project data, which helped
build up a rich evidential picture. Furthermore, an
indigenous Maori1 perspective was present throughout
the evaluation ensuring Maori views were heard,
respected, and actioned within this mainstream project.